Appellate Court Overturns Engoron’s Trump Ruling

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

The man once lauded by the left as the fearless knight in black robes, ready to smite Donald Trump with the mighty sword of justice, just got bench-slapped in broad daylight by a unanimous panel of judges who clearly had enough of his antics.

Judge Arthur Engoron—yes, that Engoron—was off by over half a billion dollars in his penalty calculation against President Trump. Half a billion. With a “B.” You could almost hear calculators short-circuiting across the city trying to figure out how someone with a robe and a gavel came to such a mind-melting number based on property values that were more fiction than Zillow fan-fiction.

And here’s where the snark practically writes itself: the guy who said Trump and his witnesses were “denying reality” somehow pegged Mar-a-Lago at $18 million. Eighteen. Million. For 20 acres of prime Palm Beach oceanfront real estate, with historical designation, resort-level amenities, and, oh yeah, one of the most famous addresses in the world. You could barely buy a shoebox apartment in Manhattan for that these days. So when Engoron claimed it was Trump who was making stuff up, well, the irony is so thick it needs its own crosswalk.

It gets better. You remember those poor, defenseless lenders who were allegedly duped by Trump’s inflated asset valuations? Yeah, turns out they made money. They testified they were paid back in full. They even said they’d happily do business with Trump again. You’d think in a fraud case, you’d need, you know, actual victims. Not in Engoron’s courtroom. Apparently, political theater trumps legal precedent.

Letitia James, meanwhile, comes out of this looking like the co-director of a flop Broadway production. Remember when she ran for office promising to “get Trump” before she ever saw a shred of evidence? Turns out that’s not how due process works—at least not when appellate judges still have functioning spines. She needed someone on the bench who was just as willing to toss objectivity to the wind in exchange for fifteen minutes of MSNBC glory. Enter Engoron, the guy who seemed more ready for his close-up than for cross-examination.

And yes, the image is burned into memory: Engoron removing his glasses and staring into the courtroom cameras like Norma Desmond waiting for the director to yell “Action!” Except this wasn’t a movie. This was a court of law—or at least it was supposed to be.

Judge David Friedman and his colleagues on the appellate panel were not amused. Friedman torched Engoron’s ruling, basically saying it made a mockery of New York’s own legal standards. He pointed out what every halfway-rational observer already knew: the law used in the case was never intended to go after arm’s-length commercial deals between competent parties. And the only fraud happening here might have been the legal one inflicted by Engoron’s courtroom.

The cherry on top? Multiple judges hint that Engoron’s judgment violated the Eighth Amendment. Cruel and unusual punishment… for a business dispute? Think about that. They’re comparing his fine to something out of a dystopian legal nightmare. That’s how far off base this whole circus got. And for what? So Engoron and James could play hero to the anti-Trump Twitterati?

Engoron didn’t just lose. He got laughed out of the appellate court, and his judgment now looks more like a political stunt than anything resembling justice. His decision has not only been dismantled but left in shambles, and the guy who wanted to be remembered most certainly will be—but not for the reasons he hoped.

If you’re keeping score at home, that’s: Trump 1, Lawfare 0.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *