Two separate yet equally harrowing incidents have shaken the foundations of national security in an increasingly volatile political landscape.
The Department of Justice has revealed disturbing allegations against two men—one in Georgia and one in Wisconsin—whose messages, manifestos, and malicious intent outline direct threats against high-profile American leaders, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, former President Donald Trump, and Vice President JD Vance.
On April 1, federal authorities arrested Aliakbar Mohammad Amin, a 24-year-old man from Lilburn, Georgia, following a barrage of violent threats directed at Tulsi Gabbard and her husband, Abraham Williams. Prosecutors allege that Amin, over a span of four days, sent text messages with chilling declarations, including:
“Prepare to die, you, Tulsi, and everyone you hold dear. America will burn.”
MORE LEFTIST VIOLENCE
Georgia man Aliakbar Mohammad Amin was arrested after allegedly sending unhinged messages threatening Tulsi Gabbard and her husband.
His alleged texts read: “Prepare to die, you, Tulsi, and everyone you hold dear. America will burn.”
He also reportedly… pic.twitter.com/o5xheUnKbE
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 15, 2025
Another message starkly warned that Gabbard was “living on borrowed time” and declared her home “a legitimate target.” The threats escalated further with references to Russian President Vladimir Putin, a bizarrely ominous message to Williams read:
“Tell your wife to always be on her best behavior and not to disobey Mr. Vladimir Putin’s orders. We are friendly bears But we can also be angry bears.”
This wasn’t mere bluster. Authorities discovered threatening images on Amin’s social media, including one depicting a firearm aimed at Gabbard. A real firearm was also recovered at his residence. The case not only illustrates the personal risks faced by public officials but also raises alarms about how international symbolism and digital platforms are being used to amplify domestic threats.
The second case is even more macabre. Nikita Casap, a 17-year-old from Wisconsin, now stands accused not only of murdering his mother and stepfather but of crafting a detailed plan to assassinate Donald Trump and JD Vance in an effort to ignite a political revolution. Federal authorities say Casap authored a manifesto titled “Accelerate the Collapse,” which contained chilling phrases such as:“Get rid of the president and perhaps the vice president,” and “guaranteed to bring in some chaos.”
Wisconsin 17-year-old Nikita Casap murdered his parents to fund a plot to kill President Trump and spark a revolution to “save the White race.”
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/owK39yiIMf
— AF Post (@AFpost) April 13, 2025
His alleged writings echoed white supremacist ideologies, claiming a need to “save the white race” through violent revolution. This rhetoric mirrors the language of other manifestos tied to recent acts of domestic terrorism. Authorities discovered digital materials, including diagrams for bomb-making, and are considering serious federal charges, including attempted assassination and use of weapons of mass destruction.
Both cases underscore a grave trend: political violence is no longer a distant threat but a growing reality. The suspects, differing in background and motive, are united by a willingness to use violence as a means of political expression. Their acts aren’t simply criminal—they’re ideological.
Gabbard’s team, meanwhile, raised another pressing concern. Despite credible threats, major media outlets, including CNN, allegedly published her home address—an action her chief of staff called out as reckless and dangerous.
In both cases, the stakes are not just individual lives but the very stability of public discourse and democratic leadership. As prosecutors work to contain these threats, the broader question remains: how do we confront a climate where violence is becoming a language of political dissent?
The answer may lie not only in enforcement but in vigilance, responsibility, and an urgent cultural reckoning with the digital accelerants of extremism.
