Public Reacts to Clinton’s Recent Statement

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Oh, Hillary. Just when you think she’s ridden off into the political sunset in a pantsuit made of broken dreams and deleted emails, she pops back up like a bad sequel no one asked for.

This time? She’s on stage at the 92nd Street Y in New York, holding court with Margaret Hoover, and delivering advice to the future first female president. Now, given her résumé of political missteps and selective memory, you might think she’d offer a bit of humility, a dash of unity, maybe even a sprinkle of graciousness to her fellow women in politics. But nope—true to form, Hillary decided it was time to dunk on Republican women. Again.

According to her, most women on the right are just “handmaidens to the patriarchy.” That’s rich coming from someone whose entire career was springboarded by her marriage to the king of skirt-chasing, Bill Clinton. If being a “handmaiden” means supporting the men in your life as they climb the ladder, Hillary might want to look in the mirror before she starts hurling dystopian insults. This is the same woman who rode shotgun through the ‘90s as her husband faced credible accusations of infidelity, abuse of power, and let’s not forget—perjury. But Hillary stood by him, not because she believed in old-fashioned marital loyalty, but because his political survival meant hers did too.

Let’s not rewrite history. Hillary Clinton didn’t smash any glass ceilings without someone else holding the ladder. Her Senate seat? Hand-delivered on the coattails of her First Lady fame. Her Secretary of State gig? Courtesy of Barack Obama, who—spoiler alert—defeated her in 2008. Hillary’s rise isn’t some grassroots tale of rugged political independence; it’s a case study in strategic proximity to power. And yet, she has the gall to sneer at conservative women, painting them all as submissive enablers of a male-dominated structure?

And the hypocrisy doesn’t end there. While she’s out here playing gender politics like it’s a game of whack-a-mole, she’s spent her career defending actual patriarchal predators. Remember Gennifer Flowers? Paula Jones? Juanita Broaddrick? Monica Lewinsky? For a woman who claims to stand up for the sisterhood, Hillary’s track record reads like a cautionary tale of what happens when ambition eclipses principle. She wasn’t just standing by her man—she was actively running interference, spinning the narrative, and tossing any inconvenient woman under the Clinton campaign bus.

Fast forward to the Weinstein era, and surprise—same song, different verse. When Lena Dunham and Tina Brown tried to wave red flags about Harvey Weinstein during Hillary’s campaign, Team Clinton’s response was essentially, “Why didn’t you tell the cops instead of us?” Oh sure, because the Clinton machine was known for its sterling moral compass and unflinching pursuit of justice. Give us a break.

And if you’re a woman who dares to vote against Hillary? Buckle up. In 2018, she openly declared that married white women didn’t vote for her because they were just parroting their husbands. According to Hillary, if you didn’t punch your ballot for her, it wasn’t because you had a brain and principles—it was because you were under the hypnotic sway of your husband or your boss or your…son? Yes, she really said that. The message was loud and clear: vote for me, or you’re a traitor to your gender. Classy.

Here’s the irony that wraps this all up like a shiny bow: Hillary Clinton has spent her public life trashing women while claiming to champion them. Her feminism only stretches as far as the loyalty of the women around her. Challenge her narrative? You’re a traitor. Complicate her legacy? You’re erased. And yet she still has the audacity to position herself as the oracle of female empowerment.

So the next time Hillary takes the stage to offer advice to future female leaders, maybe someone should remind her that real leadership doesn’t require crushing women who disagree with you. It doesn’t require excusing predatory men just because they’re useful. And it definitely doesn’t require being the loudest voice in a movement you’ve consistently betrayed when it was politically inconvenient.

Thankfully, the first female president of the United States won’t be Hillary Clinton. And if she’s smart, she won’t take Hillary’s advice, either.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

WordPress Double Opt-in by Forge12