Politician Criticizes Synagogue After Protest

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

New York City is about to be run like a freshman dorm debate club on day two of Model UN. Meet your new mayor-elect, Zohran Mamdani, who just offered a masterclass in how to not handle a rabid, antisemitic mob blocking Jews from entering a synagogue: by pretending the real criminal here is… the synagogue itself. Because nothing says “leadership” quite like shrugging off hate speech while diving headfirst into an imaginary stack of “international law” violations.

Let’s set the scene: Park East Synagogue, a historic house of worship led by 95-year-old Rabbi Arthur Schneier — a Holocaust survivor, mind you — hosted an informational event by Nefesh B’Nefesh, an organization that helps Jews make legal aliyah (that’s Jewish immigration to Israel, for the uninitiated). A standard, peaceful, and lawful event.

But to a group of pro-Palestinian protesters, this was apparently the apocalypse. They descended on the synagogue like it was a war crime tribunal, blocking the entrance, chanting charming phrases like “Death to the IDF” and “Globalize the Intifada,” and unloading a barrage of slurs and threats that would make your average Twitter troll blush. Imagine elderly congregants trying to attend a simple evening event only to be met by a crowd screaming for their global extermination.

Now, here comes Mamdani — the man who’s supposed to be the next steward of America’s largest city — and what does he do? Condemn the mob? Speak out against antisemitism? Remind New Yorkers that no one should be threatened for their faith?

Not quite.

Instead, Mamdani released a carefully calibrated, mealy-mouthed statement that sounded like it was pulled from the “How to Sound Concerned Without Taking a Side” handbook. He “discouraged the language” — bold! — and then swiftly pivoted to his real concern: that the synagogue might be violating international law. Yes, you read that right. The problem, apparently, wasn’t the mob calling for violence. It was that Jews were learning how to move to Israel.

And the supposed violation? According to Mamdani’s crack team of international law experts (read: Twitter lawyers), the synagogue event was “promoting settlement activity beyond the Green Line.” Because obviously, a 95-year-old Holocaust survivor hosting an info session in Manhattan is practically the Geneva Conventions’ worst nightmare.

Let’s be honest. This isn’t about international law. This is about laundering antisemitism through a progressive filter so it looks sophisticated instead of sinister. Mamdani could’ve just said what every decent person already knows — that mobs don’t get to intimidate Jews at synagogues, period. But that’s not the kind of clarity we’re getting. Instead, we’re treated to a pseudo-legal smokescreen meant to dodge accountability while giving a wink and a nod to the protesters.

And let’s not ignore the political convenience here. Condemning antisemitism would alienate too many of Mamdani’s activist allies, so he does the dance: discourage the “language,” pretend the synagogue broke some imaginary international statute, and hope the media moves on before anyone asks a follow-up question. It’s cowardice dressed up as nuance.

Meanwhile, Mayor Eric Adams, no stranger to progressive pressure himself, called the mob “sick and warped.” That’s how you lead. Clear, unambiguous, morally sane. You call out hate when you see it. You don’t wrap it in the comforting gauze of “international law” to excuse your silence.

So what should New Yorkers expect when the real chaos hits? When mobs aren’t just shouting, but maybe doing worse? If this incident is any indication, Mamdani will be in a corner somewhere flipping through an Amnesty International pamphlet and wondering aloud if the Jews had filled out the right paperwork.

It’s the kind of response that makes you wonder if the city’s moral compass is being held together by a thread — or maybe by the same people who think Hamas is just misunderstood and synagogue attendance needs to be UN-approved.

This isn’t leadership. This is ideological paralysis with a press secretary.

Daily Wire

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *